Ceci est une image remarquable sur la Wikipédia en roumain (Imagini de calitate) et est considéré(e) comme l'une de nos meilleures images.
Si vous pensez que ce fichier doit être une Image remarquable de
Raison : None of this maps are invented, all are consistent with the sources Nicolae Iorga's History of Romanians and Eastern Romanity, University of Bucharest, 1945; Cornelia Bodea, Ștefan Pascu, Liviu Constantinescu's Romania: Atlas Istorico-geografic, Romanian Academy 1996, (ISBN 973-27-0500-0); Ion Barnea and Ștefan Ștefănescu's Byzantines, Romanians and Bulgarians on the Lower Danube, Romanian Academy, Bucharest 1971, OCLC 1113905; Victor Spinei's Great Migrations in the East and South East of Europe from the Ninth to the Thirteenth Century, Bucharest 2003 (ISBN 973-85894-5-2) and The Romanians and the Turkic Nomads North of the Danube Delta from the Tenth to the Mid-Thirteenth century, Koninklijke Brill NV, Bucharest 2009 (ISBN 978-90-04-17536-5); Alexandru Avram, Mircea Babeş, Lucian Badea, Mircea Petrescu-Dîmboviţa and Alexandru Vulpe's (dir.), Istoria românilor: moştenirea timpurilor îndepărtate (“History of the Romanians: the heritage of ancient times”) vol.1, ed. Enciclopedică, Bucharest 2001 (ISBN 973-45-0382-0); Stelian Brezeanu's, Romanitatea Orientalǎ în Evul Mediu, Editura All Educational, Bucharest 1999, p. 229-246. But anachronistic and nationalist interpretations understand the adjective romanesti as referring exclusively to the modern nation-state, not the Roman-speaking population, and want to see this representation of the historic political formations located in the territories of current Romania and neighboring countries, as national romanian states in the modern sense of the term (romanian nationalist PoV), or as Romanian irredentist claims (hungarian or russian nationalist PoV). This interpretations claim that all the cited authors are irrelevant because they are Romanian. But it's wrong: in one hand, the past does not belong exclusively to any modern state: it is a collective heritage, shared between several current countries; on the other hand, Romania has no territorial claims. Wanting to limit the history of the Romanians only to the existence and territory of the modern Romanian state is like pretending that the Italians have no history and did not exist before the Italian Unity (Risorgimento).
DescriptionAnimatieGraniteRomania 1859-2010.gif
Română: Animație cu evoluția teritorială pe teritoriul României până în 1859 și schimbările granițelor României între 1859-2010
English: Animation with the territorial evolution on the territory of Romania until 1859 and the changes of Romania's borders since 1859 to 2010 :
Territories that never belonged to a Romanian State
Cette image a été (ou est ici-même) mise à disposition dans le domaine public par son auteur, Scooter20 dans le projet Wikimedia Commons. Ceci s'applique partout dans le monde.
Au cas où cela n'est pas possible légalement : Scooter20 donne à toute personne le droit d'utiliser ce document dans n'importe quel but, sans aucune condition, à moins que de telles conditions soient imposées par la loi.
La page de description originale était ici. Tous les noms d'utilisateur qui suivent se rapportent à ro.wikipedia.
2010-09-28 22:29 Scooter20 1000×861× (163447 bytes) Îmbunătățiri: 1. culoare mai deschisă 2. Cluj / Cluj - Napoca 3. Brașov / Stalin
2009-12-31 12:59 Scooter20 1000×861× (160885 bytes) {{Informaţii |Descriere=Animaţie cu schimbările graniţelor României între 1859-2010 |Sursa=proprie, inspirându-mă din hărţi de la [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Atlas_of_Romania] |Data=31 Dec 2009 |Autor=[[Utilizator:Scooter20]] |Permisiune=
Légendes
Ajoutez en une ligne la description de ce que représente ce fichier
You didn't read the caption. Transylvania does not appear as a state "governed by Romanians", like Wallachia or Moldavia, but as a state containing a Romanian population. We know that for modern Hungarian historiography the Romanians appeared in Transylvania only during the 13th century as a very minority after having disappeared for a thousand years, but this does not mean that this theory is the only valid one.