« Discussion:Neutron » : différence entre les versions
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
Annulation de la modification de 2.247.254.21 (d) |
Aucun résumé des modifications Balises : Modification par mobile Modification par le web mobile |
||
Ligne 12 :
Je ne dirais pas que le neutron n´a pas de charges électriques, mais simplement qu´il est globalement neutre car il est composé de deux quarks down et d´un quark up, ce qui montre qu´il possède des charges électriques. Ceci est confirmé par le fait qu´il présente un moment magnétique. Denis G. F. David
:Je viens d'inclure ton commentaire dans l'article, mais rien ne t'empêchait de le faire toi-même ;) [[Utilisateur:Perditax|Perditax]] 25 avril 2006 à 13:51 (CEST)
==Inside nucleons with proof==
""PHYSICS BREAKTHROUGH""
Easy proof for model works over calculation of no charge not eleptic neutron radius from mass difference to proton.
Inside neutron are only shells of electron positron rotator pairs and outer rotator is defining radius. After electron away and positron in center with normal before relativistic mass itvs a proton. 2 * relativistic mass-normal mass=mass difference and relativistic mass set into coulomb(+gravity) = centripetal force equation leads to radius fully right a little less than measured. Every shell with own spin in different combinations the particle zoo with el. mg. changing fields between shells
holding shell gap distance and if two nucleons near together the posi-electrons of outer shell are circling also around other nucleons building up strong force same atomic electron shells in chemical connections.
Decays showing positrons and electrons going in and out with
ß+, ß-, epsilon and K decays...
A. Einstein not knowing Henri Poincare and group E = m*c² writing special relativity book?
Last stone to insert is E(inner unrest) for nucleons and E=h*f was from Max Planck etc. etc.
New little decreased proton radius 841.8am after Max Planck institute also matching nucleon model for nucleons.
With exact measured proton to neutron radius difference also shells number predictable and
adding up relativistic rotator masses mr =const/r leads to neutron mass for confirmation.
Quarks theory is not meaning that there are just 3 real parts inside nucleons and not proved by CERN like higgs field, string, supersymetry etc.
== Pourquoi des neutrons ==
| |||