Utilisateur:Julmo2/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

• Name of article: Jacques Lacoursière
• Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. J'ai choisi cet article parce que c'est un historien québécois qui est un excellent vulgarisateur.

Lead

Guiding questions

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Oui
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Oui
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Oui
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Très concis.

Content

Guiding questions

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Oui
• Is the content up-to-date? Il n'y a pas beaucoup d'information. Pas à jour et très incomplet.
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Oui, plusieurs information manque. Il n'y a que quelques phrases dans sa biographie.
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Non

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions

• Is the article neutral? Oui
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Non
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Non
• Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Non

Sources and References

Guiding questions

• Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Non
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Oui
• Are the sources current? Oui
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Non
• Check a few links. Do they work? Oui

Organization

Guiding questions

• Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Oui
• Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Non
• Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Oui

Images and Media

Guiding questions

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Pas beaucoup
• Are images well-captioned? Bof
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? il me semble
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Oui

Checking the talk page

Guiding questions

• What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Quelqu'un doute de la date de naissance.
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C'est une ébauche. Il fait partie du projet Québec et du projet Nouvelle-France.
• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? N/D

Overall impressions

Guiding questions

• What is the article's overall status? Ébauche
• What are the article's strengths? La liste de publication est quand même bien remplie
• How can the article be improved? Il manque de nombreuses information sur sa vie, ses études, sa carrière.
• How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Très peu développé.

Optional activity

• Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

• Link to feedback: