Utilisateur:Michel Abada/Article en cours de modification/Palais des hasmonéens et Saint des Saints
- 8) A theory about the location of the Hasmonean Palace in the region of the junction of Misgav Ladach Street and Shonei Halachot Street
- 9) A theory about the location of the Hasmonean Palace in Beit Hamidot in the Herodian quarter
- 10) A schematic location of the functions near the first wall in the north, based on the descriptions of Josephus Flavius
- 11) Remains of a Hasmonean Tower and of a wall in the upper part of Shonei Halachot Street
- 14) Proposal for location of the various functions that were near the first wall in the north, on the background of the map of the city and the excavations
- 15) In order to see what is happening in the Azarah, the Hasmonean Palace must be located within the range of horizontal angles of sight.
- 18) If we assume that the Temple was located in the Dome of the Winds, this implies that the Hasmonean Palace was located to the north of the first wall, contrary to the original evidence and the assumptions of the researchers.
- 19) If we assume that the Temple was located in the Dome of the Rock, this implies that the Hasmonean Palace was located to the north of the first wall, contrary to the original evidence and the assumptions of the researchers.
- 20) If we assume that the Hasmonean Palace was located in the region of the Herodian quarter, this implies that the Temple was located outside the area called the Temple Mount in the region of the Beit Omaia palaces, which is contrary to all the methods.
- 21) If we assume that the Temple was in the El Kas region, we find that in the range of the two angles there is located the Hasmonean Palace, whose location may be found based on the sources and the archeological findings.
- 22) From the Phasael and the Hippicus towers, it was not possible to see what was happening in the Azarah if we assume that the Temple was located in the region of the Dome of the Rock.
- 23) If we locate the Temple in the Dome of the Rock, Agrippa had to climb to a height of 55m in order to see what was happening in the Azarah. The height of the building would have to be about 120 cubits. There were no buildings of such a height in Jerusalem in the period of the Second Temple.
- 24) If we locate the Azarah in the region of El Kas, Agrippa could look at the Azarah from a height of 21m only.
